The Hijra community and the complex path to decolonising gender in Bangladesh

A really helpful article making some important distinctions about Hijra and Trans.

The Queerness

The need to understand gender as a spectrum must include non-Western identities and a move towards decolonising queerness. Ibtisam Ahmed explores the history of the Hijra community in Bangladesh.


Ways of exploring and experiencing queerness are extremely diverse, and this is being accepted by a growing number of people in recent years. It is an encouraging development but it still carries its pitfalls. One of the biggest challenges that is still being faced is a false equivalence of conceptualising all types of genders and sexualities through a strictly Western lens. In particular, there is often a misconception in cisgender activist circles of misunderstanding non-Western third gender identities.

In Bangladesh, the third gender identity is known as Hijra. The community is an indelible part of not only queer culture but of the national social fabric. Centuries before Bangladesh was even conceived as a modern nation state, and even before the…

View original post 841 more words

Pride in London and my Queer journey – a personal perspective and response to @LondonLGBTPride

A brave and open account of the intersectionality of identities and how we all have a responsibility to fight for true diversity and inclusion of the more marginalised in our communities.  How we white cisgender men need to recognise our privilege and make space for others.  So much respect for Edward Lord here in speaking his truth.

Source: Pride in London and my Queer journey – a personal perspective and response to @LondonLGBTPride

My journey as a gay man with depression

A helpful blog about the challenges of depression

The Queerness

Guest writer, Peter Minkoff, recounts his very personal journey with depression as part of our mental health month.


There was a time in my life when I absolutely loathed the word ‘depression’. Whenever someone is having a bad day, they nonchalantly throw around the phrase ‘I’m depressed’ – no, you’re not, you’re just having a sucky day. I felt so frustrated with people around me because they had no clue what real depression is. I, on the other hand, did. You’ve probably heard this story a thousand times, but no depression story is the same, and each and every person fighting depression is different, their experience is different. It took a lot of self-convincing for me to share my story, but I’m doing it because I truly hope that my voice will be heard and that some struggling gay person will take away something positive from it.

The beginning

Let me…

View original post 856 more words

Running a culturally competent service

I co-run a person-centered generalist counselling service that has a specialist focus on those who are GSRD – that is, their gender, sexuality or relationship styles are diverse (or divergent) from cisgender, heterosexual, monogamous etc. Clients who want to come to counselling don’t need to be talking about any of these topics, but should they wish to, we hope to meet them with a higher level of cultural competency than most counselling services in the UK. The service is based in a small city in the midlands that is lucky enough to have at least two universities (and other colleges) offering courses in counselling, which means we get a lot of enquiries from trainees who want to do a placement with us. This counselling service has always had a specialist GSRD focus, and the one thing we knew was that we needed culturally competent counsellors. To do this, we applied a somewhat unconventional method of sifting through applications: we created a series of vignettes.

 

Since we started this approach, we have had 12 applications to the service. Four have gone to interview, and two have been taken on. Two others are not yet at the stage in their course of being ready to see clients and are completing our in-house training sessions to help them become culturally competent counsellors. I want to share some of the responses with you. I haven’t sought permission from any except our current trainees, so I will portmanteau the responses rather than quoting verbatim- and ‘quotes’ are paraphrases.

 

There are five vignettes for applicants to follow. The first asks for thoughts and responses to a bearded client with a name usually considered female, such as ‘Elizabeth’. The next asks how a bisexual client’s identity might be linked to her impulsivity and difficulty making decisions. The third asks for your first and second internal responses to a man telling you he is in multiple ethical relationships. The fourth is a woman who identifies as a submissive who hesitatingly tells you she enjoys receiving pain, and are asked how you feel about this relationship, and how you react internally and externally, and finally there is a 17 year old who is genderqueer and has just come out to their mum. you had seen them for a number of sessions and not known this. where do you go? All these are required answers, with an optional last space for other thoughts. This is our entire application process. We require nothing else until we get to interview (which is in part a 30 minute triad where applicants meet a trans client). We select people out based on their answers. We don’t require everyone to be very competent at all answers, but we look for at a minimum, a lack of judgement based on the responses, and some level of understanding that our client group requires a level of competency that might be different to mainstream counselling.

What interests me is the sheer number of respondents who feel that ‘simply being person-centered’ is enough. There are many responses especially to the first question that state things like ‘this is a client like any other client’. And of course, in one way, they are. But in other ways they are not. They will have unique ways of being in the world. And just responding about the client requires you to make linguistic decisions. Do you choose ‘he’ for the beard? ‘she’ for the name? ‘they’ (or another gender-neutral pronoun) for the ambiguity of the situation? Most responses assume ‘female’. Some responses (including our two trainees) speak of a possible trans identity or genderfluidity, and a willingness to understand and know the client’s experience, some speak to the possibility of a cis woman with an endocrine imbalance, but many, when asked what it would be important to ask, gloss over this completely. It seems that gender has become the elephant in the room. Of course, it is the client’s right to talk about what they want to talk about, but (and I have cheated a bit here) in our service, clients are asked for their pronouns at their assessments. This is a basic component without which counselling cannot proceed authentically, but respondents seem to ignore this in the hope that that will be ok.

For the bisexual and impulsive client I am really pleased that the large majority of respondents don’t make any immediate connection between sexuality and decision-making, although there is a sizeable minority who theorise that the client is ‘confused’ about her sexuality, or that somehow, feeling attracted to ‘both’ genders is out of the client’s control (unlike compulsory heterosexuality?).

Moving on to the multiple relationships question, I loved that one of my trainees immediately assumed that the client was a gay man, and then immediately caught that assumption. That ability to reflect honestly in the application was one of the first indicators that may me feel I wanted to interview him. My other trainee immediately noticed that she would want to be taking care to make good use of supervision when working with a relationship style outside of her own. Other responses tended to comment that ‘if the client doesn’t have a problem with his relationship style, why does he feel the need to talk about it? perhaps this IS a problem, after all’ (paraphrased). This smacks of ‘why do gays have to flaunt themselves?’. Another typical responses to this question is ‘why does he feel the need to have multiple relationships?’, to which I have the question ‘why do you as the counsellor feel the need to (presumably) only have one at a time?’. Somebody suggested that they would tell the client that that information wasn’t relevant to the session. So much for not judging…

The submissive masochist gives perhaps the most intriguing responses. My all-time favourite response has been something like ‘I would feel the client’s pain’. Other responses have been around safeguarding, concern about safety, feeling anger and upset for the client. Judgemental responses have included ‘I would like to know why the client chooses to stay in this type of relationship rather than work through her abusive past’ (no abuse is detailed as part of the vignettes). Positive responses have been around recognising the client’s hesitation as a fear of being judged, and not wanting to judge. Internal feelings and responses TO the client involve feeling that this is violent and controlling and TELLING the client that, that it’s ‘not right’ to be in this style of relationship and that person would work to ‘get the feelings of hurt to surface’, but other internal and external responses have been about recognising that this is not the counsellor’s own personal preference (no-one has thus far said ‘yeah – I get it’), but that consenting adults can consent. Some have mentioned that they would like to check out whether there was informed consent and as long as there was, then all would be fine.

In the genderqueer scenario, responses range from merely ‘thanks for telling me’, to long and considered thoughts about wondering whether the counsellor had missed anything in the six previous sessions; whether they could have acted differently; how to make the space as safe as possible for the client to continue; a desire to explore exactly what a genderqueer identity might mean, rather than rely on a label as a placeholder.

Finally, the final thoughts for our applicants aren’t obligatory. two people have chosen not to respond so far. But many of the other ten gave honest and thoughtful answers, about how these scenarios had caused applicants to think about topics they wouldnt have considered, how they would wish to have further training, something that it seems is not (or not really) covered. It was good to note that even in the sometimes clumsy responses from people (because none of us is an expert across all responses at all times), that people had a genuine desire to try, and to get things right, and to further their knowledge. It was disappointing to see intimated that from those who are current students (I am certain of at least six looking for a trainee placement), there is no real training on these topics at their institutions. Students who claimed knowledge often did so from their own vantage points (usually as gay or lesbian or having a G/L family member, and this gave them an insight into other minorities), but no-one mentioned having any knowledge from their courses.

All in all, this is a really interesting process for us, and has proven very useful in helping to ascertain whether someone would be a good fit for our service. It suggests that there are many trainees out there however, with significant ‘blindspots’ in their understandings, which will probably go unchallenged up to and including the moment when a GSRD client walks into their counselling room. Whilst some of these applicants will clearly rise to the challenge and make good use of supervision and self-reflection, my concern rests with a number of people who judged my theoretical clients as somehow ‘lacking’ and weren’t afraid to tell the clients that they were making that kind of judgement.

 

 

References:

Davies, D. (2007) Not in Front of the Students Therapy Today Vol 18 (1) http://www.therapytoday.net/article/show/1573/not-in-front-of-the-students/

Davies, D and Barker, M J (2015) How gender and sexually diverse-friendly is your therapy training. The Psychotherapist (61) https://issuu.com/ukcp-publications/docs/61_the_psychotherapist_autumn_2015/8

 

 

Theraputic abuse and red flags

So much wisdom here.

Counselling in Northumberland

I have written a number of times on the need for better regulation of counselling and psychotherapy in the UK. Given our position, where anyone, regardless of qualifications can call themselves a coach, counsellor or psychotherapist, information is vital to allow clients to protect themselves. At a bare minimum clients need to know that a potential therapist is qualified, insured, and a member of a regulatory body. For me there is almost a protective desire to try to empower clients. I am reminded of how Carl Rogers (one of the founding giants of counselling) described the difference in power between therapist and client;  A client enters into the counselling relationship vulnerable and incongurent, and meets with the therapist, who is authentic and congruent. That vulnerability is a part of the process, but also easy for the unscrupulous to exploit.

It is with this in mind that the idea of…

View original post 1,312 more words

We expect, and need, better than this from the BACP

Very pleased to see a sane response to this ridiculous ethical dilemma. It my view, the dilemma is should Marna and her supervisor be in practice with such unexamined and sex negative beliefs.
If anyone wishes to read the original article here is a link:
http://www.bacp.co.uk/docs/pdf/15887_therapy-today-march-2017.pdf pages 20-21.

Counselling in Northumberland

The in-house journal of the British Association of Counselling and Psychotherapy is Therapy Today. It is sent to every member of the organisation as well as being hosted online. The BACP have been quick to remind people that reading it counts as CPD, and so it seems safe to assume it promotes it’s beliefs, attitudes and outlook towards ethical practice.

It was therefore  worrying and disappointing to see featured an ethical dilemma around viewing pornography which seemed to be written with no knowledge or understanding or either sexuality or good therapeutic and supervisionary practices. It is difficult to create believable hypothetical scenarios, however, if it is done, it is important that they reflect not only best practice but the values and beliefs of the organisation.

The Dilemma (All people are imaginary)

Marna is a counsellor who rents a room from a larger counselling agency. Another room within the same building…

View original post 1,423 more words

Pink Therapy is changing!

As my plan to share the load for the running and development of the organisation, by creating a franchise where some of my colleagues would take on the administration of the face-to-face courses has stalled, I’m now moving ahead with other plans.

We will be winding down our face-to-face training programme after the current advertised workshops are complete.  So book now or miss your chance!

We will be continuing to run our two-year  Post Graduate Diploma in Gender, Sexuality and Relationship Diversity Therapy (GSRD) which is largely delivered online and we will be delivering online Continuing Professional Development to reach out to people unable to travel easily to London or who don’t have the time to commit to a full specialist vocational training. In fact our PG Diploma is close to having recruited a full cohort, with just a couple of places remaining.

One of the new projects is that I will be increasing the Clinical Associate team. 

Up until now the Clinical Associates team was a small group of highly experienced therapists based in London who met three times a year and were recruited to try and keep a balance in gender and theoretical model.  They got a privileged position on the website and paid an increased membership fee for being an associate (alongside their directory membership); they also got a discount on undertaking our training events and reduced conference fee. They became the faculty for our training workshops and courses and were a great think tank.

I am now seeking to recruit more Clinical Associates especially outside of London.  The organisation has been accused of being too London-centric and I think this is an opportunity to do something about that.  I am keen to demonstrate there are a wider range of GSRD-experienced therapists across the UK (and beyond).

Joining the new Associates team will be by invitation

Apologies in advance if you would like to take up this role but don’t receive an invitation yet. The criteria are largely that you are:
• accredited by us,
• have attended significant training with us,
• are faculty on our programmes
• have contributed to the field through publications, training etc.
I am also keen to ensure the majority are from outside of London and that we continue to reflect the diversity of GSRD identities.

The new Associates will be invited to attend an annual networking meeting and be expected to continue to commit to professional development in this rapidly changing area of work. There will also be a separate membership fee to reflect the elevated profile and provide some additional income for the organisation.

Dominic Davies
Founder and CEO
7 February 2017